Readify

Kerry Bolton

Lords of Chaos

Kerry Bolton was a New Zealand-based writer and organizer whose journals, occult projects, and political interpretations found a readership in the Black Metal underground. He treated Satanism not simply as a posture of blasphemy but as a possible catalyst for cultural change, and argued that rebellion against Christianity could lead toward a wider critique of modern Western society. His account gives the scene a double aspect: its capacity to draw committed young people into further study and action, and its tendency, in the absence of a coherent direction, to turn rebellious energy toward ill-chosen targets.

Publications and underground networks

Bolton published The Nexus, a small journal with a significant Black Metal readership. He had also assisted with the editing of Key of Alocer, an occult and Black Metal fanzine produced in New Zealand that attracted readers internationally. These publications connected the music underground with material on Satanism and occultism, rather than treating the scene solely as a musical formation. The book presents Bolton as a participant in underground agitation over several decades, with publishing and organizing as linked parts of his activity.

His organizational work included founding the now-defunct Black Order, an international occult group dedicated to invoking what the book calls the shadow side of Europe. The group drew many adherents from the Black Metal scene. Bolton also contributed to the operations of the Order of the Jarls of Bælder, a more prevalent organization that attracted musicians and fans. The Order published material on Satanism and heathenism and offered physical-fitness and warrior-arts courses. Bolton regarded it as allied with his own aims. Together, these networks show how ideas circulated beyond lyrics and imagery, through journals, groups, and organized instruction.

Satanism as a route beyond provocation

Bolton distinguished between the scene’s shallow use of Satanic language and the more serious pursuit of ideas. Much Black Metal Satanism, in his assessment, consisted of familiar catchphrases and symbols copied from admired bands, sometimes supplemented by fragments from occult writing, horror fiction, or films. He criticized magazines and bands that reduced Satanism to insulting Christianity and Jesus, arguing that such gestures became childish, predictable, and tiresome. He also observed that the mass media and entertainment industry made a medieval image of Devil worship readily available to young people seeking Satanism.

Against that limited model, Bolton described his own efforts as an attempt to make Satanism politically and culturally consequential. He said he established esoteric orders and publishing ventures in a manner comparable to organizing a political campaign, aiming to make them accessible. He saw serious, inquisitive people within Metal as a reason to engage with the scene. Anti-Christianity, sometimes shaped by Nietzschean ideas, could serve as an initial tactic for youths seeking to free themselves from Christianity; his broader argument was that Christianity was only one feature of what he regarded as a wider Western crisis. He connected it with plutocracy, liberalism, globalism, and egalitarianism, and hoped to show young people a relationship among these conditions and doctrines that might give their rebellious impulses direction.

Heritage, nationalism, and rebellion

Bolton interpreted the movement from Satanism toward indigenous heathen religions as part of a search for cultural anchorage. He associated that turn with dissatisfaction with nihilism and the superficiality of a global consumer culture. In his account, nationalism and heathenism or Satanism arose from related collective sources: nationalism expressed a people’s collective unconscious politically, while heathenism and Satanism expressed it spiritually. He treated the overlap between occult interests and nationalism as historically intelligible, not accidental.

He also read the wish to shock through fascist, nationalist, or racist imagery as potentially more than a calculated bid for attention. In his view, the impulse could begin in unconscious opposition to a culture that promoted uniformity while presenting itself as individualistic. He allowed that such provocation was often negative and childish, but argued that it might lead some people toward knowledge, maturity, or a change in outlook when they encountered what they considered genuine rebellion. This was Bolton’s interpretation of the impulse, not evidence that every band or fan shared a common political position.

Strengths and limits of the scene

Bolton identified commitment among performers and fans as Black Metal’s principal strength and the reason it could endure. Its weakness, in his assessment, was the absence of focus, discipline, and a long-term view of itself as a possible resistance to the status quo. Without those, he argued, some of the most motivated participants could strike blindly at targets that were not appropriate. He also saw a lack of ideological cohesion: declarations of fascism could coexist with libertarian nihilism, without a synthesis between them.

His comments offer a counterpoint to sensational coverage that treated Black Metal as a single, uniform menace. The book separately describes media accounts that amplified the impression of a broad Satanic assault and notes Bolton’s observation that publicity could increase the value of notoriety within youth subcultures. His own emphasis, however, falls on internal distinctions: imitation versus serious study, provocation versus developed conviction, and energy versus organization. That distinction does not absolve the scene of its actions; it clarifies Bolton’s concern that intense commitment, without a disciplined purpose, could magnify confusion as readily as it could sustain resistance.